ZoikoLogia
Review Mode

Review the work
with its evidence
intact.

Inspect scope, sources, changes, unresolved items,
review observations, and handoff context in a mode
designed to keep review traceable.

Need to structure or progress the work first? Workflow Mode remains a
separate destination.

Review item 01REVIEW MODE
From Workflow Mode - ref W-01
State: Under review · Current
Scope
Evidence
Checks
Findings
Unresolved
History
Outcome
▲ 2 unresolved
◐ 1 changed■ 1 evidence restricted
⇄ 1 conflict
SELECTED OBJECT
Review item 01 · Source A
Evidence: current · Access: available
Previous version
Value not shown (specimen)
Current version
Change flagged in text: “Field updated”
FINDING 02· Needs attention
Linked to Source A · Owner: responsibility class TBD
Context
Scope: 3 objects in, 1 out
Source A · Source B
Outcome area
Reserved · source-
defined action slot
● Package received● Finding updated● Returned for change
SPECIMEN DATA
The review model

Three layers, one connected review.

A recommended structure for how a bounded package of work moves through
inspection. Select a layer to see what it shows.

LAYER 1

Receive & scope the review

What arrived from Workflow Mode, what isincluded, currentness, unresolved work andthe review boundary.

Proof UI: package summary · scope rail
LAYER 2

Inspect & challenge

Sources and evidence, changes, checksand comparisons, findings and questions,with uncertainty kept visible.

Proof UI: inspection canvas · finding drawer
LAYER 3

Disposition & handoff

A source-defined outcome, conditions, thereturn and change cycle, next destinationand history.

Proof UI: outcome rail · handoff panel · timeline

Layer 1 in the workspace below: the package summary and scope rail (A, H).

Annotated review workspace

Inspection first. Outcome second.

Review controls dominate; workflow progression controls are absent. Annotations sit
outside the frame so the interface stays credible.

Review item 01REVIEW MODEA · Scope: 3 in / 1 out
H · Source: Workflow Mode W-01
Overview
Scope
Evidence
Checks
Findings
Unresolved
History
Outcome
B · EVIDENCE INTACT
Source A → Review item 01
Type: not specified · Currentness: current · Access: available
C ▲ Unresolved: 2■ Restricted: 1⇄ Conflict: 1
Source A (reference)
Information unavailable / not
provided
Review item 01 (reviewed)
Observed state: needs attention
E · FINDING 02→ Source A, Review item 01
State: Open (example label)
Context drawer
Related: Source A,
Source B
Version: current
F · Outcome
Unavailable until
permission and package
state allow
G · History: 3 events
A

Bounded review

Package title, scope and source workflow reference stay visible.

B

Evidence intact

The selected object links to its source and currentness.

C

Attention state

Unresolved, missing, conflicting and changed states shown in text.

D

Inspection, not execution

No workflow progression controls.

E

Finding linkage

Observations tie to an object and evidence.

F

Outcome boundary

Permission and state dependent; no unsupported Approve/Reject.

G

Traceability

History and version relation without taking over.

H

Workflow relationship

Source and return handoff are visible.

Inside a review package

What a reviewer can inspect.

Recommended UI contracts for each area. Behaviors marked conditional render only
when the product confirms them.

Review intake & scope

  • Package title, purpose, source Workflow Mode reference, state, version and currentness
  • Included scope and an explicit excluded or out-of-scope list
  • Readiness summary: unresolved, missing, restricted, conflicting
  • “Ready” appears only if the product defines it

Actions

  • Open first attention item
  • View evidence
  • View history
  • No disposition until inspection state permits
Kriton™ AI Advisor boundary

AI never outruns evidence.

Kriton™ AI Advisor is a primary navigation destination, but its
behavior inside Review Mode is not established here. This
page links to the authoritative source instead of describing
AI review.

May show conditionally
Needs approved source
Contextual Kriton™ link;
advisor panel shell only if
integration is confirmed
Generated findings, anomalydetection, confidence scores,automatic comparison, automateddisposition, accuracy claims
Review evidence & history

History is part of the product
story.

Package, finding, evidence and outcome events stay
traceable where supported. Specimen events use neutral
role labels and placeholder times. No export or download
is shown unless a real export exists.

Package received

Role: review participant · Time placeholder · State: received

Finding updated

Finding 02 · Open → Addressed (example labels)

Evidence superseded

Source A · current version replaced; review impact shown if known

Returned for change

To Workflow Mode · unresolved findings carried across

Workflow Mode relationship

Doing and checking stay distinct.

Provisional boundary: Workflow Mode structures and progresses work. Review Modeinspects it after handoff. The two remain separate destinations.

Workflow Mode owns

  • Definition, context, sequence, work state
  • Dependencies, exceptions, evidence capture
  • Progression controls and work correction

Review Mode owns, as source-approved

  • Intake and scope, inspection context
  • Checks, findings, questions
  • Outcome, return-for-change, review history
Enterprise evaluation & trust

Route each question to its authoritativesource.

Trust claims live on their own pages and are not repeated here.

Governance

How review decisions are governed.

Compliance

What compliance evidence exists.

Privacy & Security

How review data is protected.

Technical detail: API Reference, Release Notes, Accessibility and Provider Due Diligence appear once approved. Until then, technical evaluation runs
through sales.

Buyer lenses

Find the proof that matters to you.

Lenses help you navigate. They are not product roles, editions or permissions.

Finance / Accounting

Scope, source evidence, changed items, unresolved work, outcome history.

Controller / Reviewer

Inspection context, comparisons, findings, return cycle, traceability.

Operations

Handoff, state visibility, unresolved work, version cycle.

IT / Architecture

Object model, permissions, events, integration boundary.

Risk / Governance

Evidence lineage, responsibility, findings, history.

Procurement / Enterprise

Trust routes, evaluation path, accessibility.

Evaluate Review Mode

See how Review Mode fits your review process.

Bring the workflow handoff, evidence, review, governance, integration anddecision requirements that matter to your team. We will route the conversation tothe appropriate evaluation path.

Submission does not guarantee pilot availability, approval capability, automated checking, AI review or accounting outcomes.

Frequently asked

Straight answers, with limits stated.